Home › AI Benchmark › Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic released on Feb 24, 2025 API access

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Anthropic) was released on Feb 24, 2025. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #119 out of 267 models, with 141.14. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 1,360 ELO points (#219). Against models of the same generation, its best result is on LiveBench: 76.10, #1 of 25.

#119 of 267 in the ECI ranking
141.14 ECI, the Epoch AI capability index
1,360 Arena ELO, human preference · #219
not measured LiveBench, overall average from 0 to 100
No votes yet. Rate it.
What the tests say

Where Claude 3.7 Sonnet stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers

Claude 3.7 Sonnet has published results on 25 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between May 30, 2024 and May 25, 2025 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.

Where it stands out

Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.

LiveBench76.10
#1 of 25 in its generation · #3 of 32 overall
GPQA Diamond78.5%
#3 of 53 in its generation · #86 of 173 overall
ForecastBench61.80
#2 of 16 in its generation · #5 of 62 overall
MATH level 591.2%
#5 of 44 in its generation · #13 of 73 overall
SimpleBench46.4%
#3 of 22 in its generation · #42 of 74 overall

Where it falls behind

Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.

Gso3.8%
#5 of 7 in its generation · record: 88.2% (Claude Fable 5.1)
See all 25 tests, one by one
TestScoreIn its generationOverallTest record
GPQA Diamond 78.5% #3 / 53 #86 / 173 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 57.8% #10 / 49 (tied with 1) #110 / 168 100.0% GPT-5.5
ARC-AGI 2 0.9% #7 / 17 #70 / 83 95.0% GPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI 28.6% #7 / 15 #67 / 81 98.5% Claude Fable 5
SimpleBench 46.4% #3 / 22 #42 / 74 81.9% Claude Fable 5
MATH level 5 91.2% #5 / 44 #13 / 73 98.1% GPT-5
FrontierMath 4.1% #8 / 23 (tied with 1) #48 / 65 51.7% GPT-5.5
ForecastBench 61.80 #2 / 16 #5 / 62 62.50 o3
Hle 8.0% #4 / 14 #28 / 39 54.8% GPT-6 Astra
Aider Polyglot 60.40 #6 / 24 (tied with 1) #13 / 38 88.00 GPT-5
Creative writing (Lech Mazur) 8.11 #4 / 24 #13 / 38 8.60 GPT-5
EnigmaEval 4.2% #5 / 13 #23 / 36 39.3% Claude Fable 5
LiveBench 76.10 #1 / 25 #3 / 32 82.35 Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)
SWE-bench Verified 61.0% #3 / 4 #28 / 32 83.5% Claude Opus 4.7
Fiction.liveBench 53.1% #7 / 16 (tied with 1) #17 / 31 100.0% o3
METR: time horizon 60.39 #5 / 10 #16 / 29 719 Claude Opus 4.6
Gso 3.8% #5 / 7 #25 / 28 88.2% Claude Fable 5.1
DeepResearch Bench 43.6% #4 / 4 #17 / 24 55.3% Claude Opus 4.6
GeoBench 3,844 #5 / 16 #11 / 24 4,333 Gemini 3 Flash
VPCT 39.0% #4 / 9 #15 / 22 91.0% Gemini 3 Pro
Cybench 20.0% #4 / 9 #10 / 19 93.0% Claude Opus 4.6
CAD-Eval 54.0% #4 / 11 (tied with 1) #5 / 14 74.0% o3
The Agent Company 40.2% #2 / 10 #4 / 14 52.4% DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Os World 35.80 #2 / 4 #6 / 8 72.10 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Spatialviz Bench 33.9% #3 / 5 #5 / 7 44.7% Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)

For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.

Comparison

What to compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet with

The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.

ModelLabECIELOLiveBenchRelease
o1 OpenAI 141.84 1,383 n/a Dec 17, 2024
DeepSeek-R1 (May 2025) DeepSeek 141.27 1,400 n/a May 28, 2025
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Anthropic 141.14 1,360 n/a Feb 24, 2025
GLM-4.6 Z.ai (Zhipu AI) 140.78 1,500 n/a Sep 30, 2025
o3-mini OpenAI 140.33 1,379 n/a Jan 31, 2025
Grok-3 mini xAI 140.33 1,394 n/a Jun 24, 2025
Kimi K2 Instruct Moonshot 140.13 n/a n/a Jul 12, 2025
Head to head

Claude 3.7 Sonnet or DeepSeek-R1 (May 2025)?

DeepSeek-R1 (May 2025) is the model from another lab closest to Claude 3.7 Sonnet in capability. Across the 13 tests both took, this is the score:

Claude 3.7 Sonnet ahead on 8 DeepSeek-R1 (May 2025) ahead on 5
Largest differences first
TestClaude 3.7 SonnetDeepSeek-R1 (May 2025)
METR: time horizon 60.39 31.17
Fiction.liveBench 53.1% 33.3%
ARC-AGI 2 0.9% 1.3%
ARC-AGI 28.6% 21.2%
DeepResearch Bench 43.6% 35.1%
Aider Polyglot 60.40 71.40
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 57.8% 66.4%
SimpleBench 46.4% 40.8%
LiveBench 76.10 71.57
MATH level 5 91.2% 96.6%

Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.

Cost per task

What Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs to deliver each task

Price per token is what is on the price sheet; cost per task is what lands on the invoice, because it depends on how many tokens the model spends. Each point is an effort level, published by whoever ran the test and compiled by Epoch AI. The further up and to the left, the more score per dollar.

ARC-AGI 2

The score scale does not start at zero.

0%1%2%3%3%US$ 0.10US$ 0.20US$ 0.50cost per task (log scale)Claude 3.7 Sonnet · · 0.0% · US$ 0.12Claude 3.7 Sonnet · · 0.9% · US$ 0.36Claude 3.7 Sonnet · · 0.7% · US$ 0.51o3-mini · low · 0.0% · US$ 0.06o3-mini · medium · 2.1% · US$ 0.28o3-mini · high · 3.0% · US$ 0.55
Claude 3.7 Sonneto3-mini

ARC-AGI

The score scale does not start at zero.

10%17%24%31%38%US$ 0.05US$ 0.17US$ 0.28US$ 0.40cost per taskClaude 3.7 Sonnet · · 13.6% · US$ 0.06Claude 3.7 Sonnet · · 21.2% · US$ 0.21Claude 3.7 Sonnet · · 28.6% · US$ 0.33o3-mini · low · 14.5% · US$ 0.05o3-mini · medium · 22.3% · US$ 0.19o3-mini · high · 34.5% · US$ 0.40
Claude 3.7 Sonneto3-mini
Family

Other models from Anthropic

The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.

ModelReleaseECIELOLiveBenchAccess
Claude Opus 4.5 Nov 24, 2025 150.17 1,504 72.6 API access
Claude Haiku 4.5 Oct 15, 2025 142.40 1,454 n/a API access
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Sep 29, 2025 146.83 1,488 n/a API access
Claude Opus 4.1 Aug 5, 2025 144.09 1,479 n/a API access
Claude Opus 4 May 22, 2025 142.65 1,442 n/a API access
Claude Sonnet 4 May 22, 2025 141.67 1,414 n/a API access
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Feb 24, 2025 141.14 1,360 n/a API access
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) Oct 22, 2024 133.53 1,342 n/a API access
Claude 3.5 Haiku Oct 22, 2024 127.17 1,286 n/a API access
Your rating

Have you used Claude 3.7 Sonnet? Rate it

n/a out of 5
no votes yet

Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.

Tap a star to vote.
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Where does Claude 3.7 Sonnet rank among AI models?

In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ranks #119 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 141.14. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.

Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than DeepSeek-R1 (May 2025)?

Across the 13 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, Claude 3.7 Sonnet comes out ahead on 8, behind on 5 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.

What is Claude 3.7 Sonnet best at?

Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of Claude 3.7 Sonnet are: LiveBench (#1 of 25); GPQA Diamond (#3 of 53); ForecastBench (#2 of 16). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.

Sources

Where each number comes from

Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.

The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.

LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.

← See the full ranking