Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)
Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) (Google DeepMind) was released on Jun 5, 2025. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #92 out of 267 models, with 145.31. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 1,507 ELO points (#46). Against models of the same generation, its best result is on SimpleBench: 62.4%, #1 of 27.
Where Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers
Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) has published results on 39 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Sep 8, 2024 and Sep 3, 2025 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.
Where it stands out
Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.
Where it falls behind
Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.
See all 39 tests, one by one
| Test | Score | In its generation | Overall | Test record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | #3 / 60 | #67 / 173 | 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon |
| AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) | 84.2% | #6 / 58 | #77 / 168 | 100.0% GPT-5.5 |
| Dtbench | 82.4% | #5 / 46 | #64 / 148 | 98.9% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Lmca | 34.77 | #6 / 36 | #65 / 121 | 68.23 Claude Opus 5.5 |
| CritPt | 2.0% | #2 / 26 | #69 / 112 | 32.3% GPT-5.6 Sol |
| WeirdML | 54.0% | #3 / 38 | #40 / 112 | 93.6% GPT-6 Astra |
| SciCode | 46.3% | #1 / 23 | #60 / 104 | 66.9% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Frontiermath Tiers 1 3 V2 | 24.6% | #5 / 11 | #70 / 86 | 93.7% GPT-6 Astra |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 4.9% | #7 / 26 (tied with 1) | #57 / 83 | 95.0% GPT-6 Astra |
| ALE-Bench | 786 | #6 / 14 | #57 / 82 | 2,951 GPT-6 Astra |
| WebDev Arena | 1,226 | #3 / 3 | #81 / 82 | 1,820 Claude Opus 5.5 |
| ARC-AGI | 41.0% | #7 / 25 | #61 / 81 | 98.5% Claude Fable 5 |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | #1 / 27 | #17 / 74 | 81.9% Claude Fable 5 |
| MATH level 5 | 95.9% | #7 / 43 | #10 / 73 | 98.1% GPT-5 |
| Frontiermath Tier 4 V2 | 0.0% | #6 / 7 (tied with 1) | #65 / 67 | 100.0% GPT-6.1 Sol |
| FrontierMath | 14.1% | #6 / 31 | #34 / 65 | 51.7% GPT-5.5 |
| ForecastBench | 61.30 | #7 / 24 | #11 / 62 | 62.50 o3 |
| Vending Bench 2 | 574 | #1 / 4 | #47 / 57 | 15,515 GPT-6 Astra |
| FrontierMath tier 4 | 4.2% | #4 / 15 (tied with 3) | #23 / 48 | 39.6% GPT-5.5 Pro |
| Hle | 21.6% | #2 / 18 | #19 / 39 | 54.8% GPT-6 Astra |
| Aider Polyglot | 79.10 | #5 / 32 | #5 / 38 | 88.00 GPT-5 |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 8.38 | #5 / 34 | #6 / 38 | 8.60 GPT-5 |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | #7 / 17 (tied with 1) | #21 / 36 | 39.3% Claude Fable 5 |
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | #4 / 8 | #26 / 33 | 84.7% GPT-5.5 |
| BALROG | 43.3% | #2 / 16 | #11 / 32 | 68.3% GPT-6 Astra |
| LiveBench | 82.35 | #1 / 23 | #1 / 32 | 82.35 Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | #7 / 8 | #30 / 32 | 83.5% Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Fiction.liveBench | 90.6% | #4 / 28 | #4 / 31 | 100.0% o3 |
| METR: time horizon | 38.73 | #11 / 15 | #20 / 29 | 719 Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Gso | 3.9% | #6 / 9 | #24 / 28 | 88.2% Claude Fable 5.1 |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | #8 / 9 | #18 / 24 | 55.3% Claude Opus 4.6 |
| GeoBench | 4,085 | #1 / 18 | #3 / 24 | 4,333 Gemini 3 Flash |
| VPCT | 48.0% | #4 / 13 | #8 / 22 | 91.0% Gemini 3 Pro |
| Algotune | 1.51 | #4 / 8 | #10 / 15 | 2.05 GPT-5.2 |
| Rli | 0.8% | #2 / 2 | #15 / 15 | 21.3% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| CAD-Eval | 64.0% | #2 / 12 | #2 / 14 | 74.0% o3 |
| The Agent Company | 39.3% | #3 / 8 | #5 / 14 | 52.4% DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
| GDPval | 23.3% | #5 / 6 | #9 / 11 | 49.7% GPT-5.2 |
| Spatialviz Bench | 44.7% | #1 / 6 | #1 / 7 | 44.7% Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) |
For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.
What to compare Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) with
The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.
| Model | Lab | ECI | ELO | LiveBench | Release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2 Thinking | Moonshot | 145.96 | n/a | n/a | Nov 6, 2025 |
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Moonshot | 145.79 | 1,456 | n/a | Nov 6, 2025 |
| GLM-5 | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | 145.78 | 1,511 | n/a | Feb 11, 2026 |
| o4-mini | OpenAI | 145.60 | n/a | n/a | Apr 16, 2025 |
| GPT-5 mini | OpenAI | 145.43 | 1,406 | n/a | Aug 7, 2025 |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) | Google DeepMind | 145.31 | 1,507 | n/a | Jun 5, 2025 |
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | DeepSeek | 144.97 | 1,461 | n/a | Sep 29, 2025 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) or GPT-5 mini?
GPT-5 mini is the model from another lab closest to Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) in capability. Across the 25 tests both took, this is the score:
| Test | Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) | GPT-5 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vending Bench 2 | 574 | -31.18 |
| CritPt | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| Frontiermath Tier 4 V2 | 0.0% | 12.2% |
| FrontierMath | 14.1% | 27.2% |
| Frontiermath Tiers 1 3 V2 | 24.6% | 46.7% |
| FrontierMath tier 4 | 4.2% | 6.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | 8.2% |
| Fiction.liveBench | 90.6% | 62.5% |
| ARC-AGI | 41.0% | 54.3% |
| VPCT | 48.0% | 40.2% |
Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.
Other models from Google DeepMind
The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.
| Model | Release | ECI | ELO | LiveBench | Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep 2025) | Sep 25, 2025 | 143.00 | 1,450 | n/a | API access |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Jun 2025) | Jun 17, 2025 | 133.95 | n/a | n/a | API access |
| gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-06-17 (Default thinking length) | Jun 17, 2025 | 133.92 | 1,401 | n/a | API access |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) | Jun 5, 2025 | 145.31 | 1,507 | n/a | API access |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro Exp (Mar 2025) | Mar 25, 2025 | 144.20 | n/a | n/a | API access |
| Gemma 3 27B | Mar 12, 2025 | 130.05 | n/a | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
| Gemma 3 12B | Mar 12, 2025 | 123.49 | n/a | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
| Gemma 3 4B | Mar 12, 2025 | 116.01 | n/a | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
| Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) | Feb 5, 2025 | 135.08 | n/a | n/a | Hosted access (no API) |
Have you used Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)? Rate it
Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.
What people ask about Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)
Where does Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) rank among AI models?
In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) ranks #92 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 145.31. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) better than GPT-5 mini?
Across the 25 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) comes out ahead on 14, behind on 11 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.
What is Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) best at?
Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) are: SimpleBench (#1 of 27); SciCode (#1 of 23); LiveBench (#1 of 23). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.
Where do the numbers on this page come from?
From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.
Where each number comes from
Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.
The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.
LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.
← See the full ranking