Qwen 3.6 Plus
Qwen 3.6 Plus (Alibaba) was released on Mar 31, 2026. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #68 out of 267 models, with 147.49. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 1,476 ELO points (#82). On LiveBench, the overall average is 68.9, #50 out of 58 scored models. Against models of the same generation, its best result is on AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS): 93.3%, #15 of 63, tied with 3 others.
Where Qwen 3.6 Plus stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers
Qwen 3.6 Plus has published results on 17 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Jul 4, 2025 and Jun 29, 2026 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.
Where it stands out
Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.
Where it falls behind
Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.
See all 17 tests, one by one
| Test | Score | In its generation | Overall | Test record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.4% | #21 / 63 (tied with 1) | #49 / 173 | 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon |
| AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) | 93.3% | #15 / 63 (tied with 3) | #45 / 168 | 100.0% GPT-5.5 |
| Dtbench | 81.9% | #35 / 59 | #66 / 148 | 98.9% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Lmca | 33.09 | #37 / 57 | #69 / 121 | 68.23 Claude Opus 5.5 |
| CritPt | 2.9% | #29 / 49 (tied with 1) | #67 / 112 | 32.3% GPT-5.6 Sol |
| SciCode | 40.7% | #32 / 45 | #73 / 104 | 66.9% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Frontiermath Tiers 1 3 V2 | 38.2% | #26 / 40 | #58 / 86 | 93.7% GPT-6 Astra |
| ALE-Bench | 670 | #36 / 49 | #64 / 82 | 2,951 GPT-6 Astra |
| WebDev Arena | 1,461 | #20 / 48 | #50 / 82 | 1,820 Claude Opus 5.5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 44.1% | #18 / 39 | #40 / 81 | 76.0% Gemini 4 Argon |
| Chess puzzles | 14.0% | #30 / 38 (tied with 3) | #65 / 80 | 76.0% GPT-6 Astra |
| Game puzzles | 12.0% | #28 / 38 (tied with 1) | #58 / 77 | 84.0% GPT-6 Astra |
| FrontierMath | 26.2% | #22 / 39 | #22 / 65 | 51.7% GPT-5.5 |
| Vending Bench 2 | 5,115 | #14 / 37 | #29 / 57 | 15,515 GPT-6 Astra |
| FrontierMath tier 4 | 8.3% | #17 / 39 | #17 / 48 | 39.6% GPT-5.5 Pro |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.9% | #26 / 26 | #29 / 32 | 83.5% Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Cl Bench | 20.3% | #7 / 18 | #7 / 19 | 27.9% GPT-5.4 |
For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.
What to compare Qwen 3.6 Plus with
The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.
| Model | Lab | ECI | ELO | LiveBench | Release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.5 | Moonshot | 147.98 | 1,495 | n/a | Jan 27, 2026 |
| Qwen 3.6 Plus | Alibaba | 147.49 | 1,476 | 68.9 | Mar 31, 2026 |
| MiniMax-M3 | MiniMax | 147.13 | 1,471 | 67.3 | Jun 1, 2026 |
| Mistral Large 4 | Mistral AI | 146.90 | 1,494 | 71.8 | Oct 6, 2026 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Anthropic | 146.83 | 1,488 | n/a | Sep 29, 2025 |
| MiniMax-M2.5 | MiniMax | 146.67 | 1,393 | n/a | Feb 12, 2026 |
| Grok Build 0.1 | xAI | no ECI | n/a | 67.8 | May 29, 2026 |
Qwen 3.6 Plus or MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is the model from another lab closest to Qwen 3.6 Plus in capability. Across the 11 tests both took, this is the score:
| Test | Qwen 3.6 Plus | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vending Bench 2 | 5,115 | 2,158 |
| Game puzzles | 12.0% | 8.0% |
| AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) | 93.3% | 71.1% |
| CritPt | 2.9% | 3.7% |
| SciCode | 40.7% | 47.1% |
| Chess puzzles | 14.0% | 13.0% |
| ALE-Bench | 670 | 640 |
| Dtbench | 81.9% | 78.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.4% | 90.9% |
| Lmca | 33.09 | 33.70 |
Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.
Other models from Alibaba
The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.
| Model | Release | ECI | ELO | LiveBench | Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.6 Flash | Apr 27, 2026 | 143.05 | n/a | n/a | Unknown |
| Qwen3.6 27B | Apr 22, 2026 | 146.48 | n/a | 64.0 | Open weights (unrestricted) |
| Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) | Apr 20, 2026 | 149.24 | 1,488 | n/a | Unknown |
| Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B | Apr 14, 2026 | 144.11 | n/a | n/a | Open weights (unrestricted) |
| Qwen 3.6 Plus | Mar 31, 2026 | 147.49 | 1,476 | 68.9 | API access |
| Qwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B) | Feb 25, 2026 | 143.77 | 1,446 | n/a | Unknown |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Feb 24, 2026 | 146.26 | 1,466 | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Feb 24, 2026 | 142.48 | 1,457 | n/a | Open weights (unrestricted) |
| Qwen3.5-9B | Feb 24, 2026 | 139.43 | n/a | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
Have you used Qwen 3.6 Plus? Rate it
Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.
What people ask about Qwen 3.6 Plus
Where does Qwen 3.6 Plus rank among AI models?
In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, Qwen 3.6 Plus ranks #68 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 147.49. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.
Is Qwen 3.6 Plus better than MiniMax-M3?
Across the 11 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, Qwen 3.6 Plus comes out ahead on 6, behind on 5 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.
What is Qwen 3.6 Plus best at?
Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of Qwen 3.6 Plus are: AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) (#15 of 63); GPQA Diamond (#21 of 63). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.
Where do the numbers on this page come from?
From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.
Where each number comes from
Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.
The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.
LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.
← See the full ranking