Home › AI Benchmark › Muse Spark
Meta AI released on Apr 8, 2026 API access

Muse Spark

Muse Spark (Meta AI) was released on Apr 8, 2026. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #47 out of 267 models, with 152.13. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 1,508 ELO points (#45). Against models of the same generation, its best result is on Hle: 40.6%, #3 of 18.

#47 of 267 in the ECI ranking
152.13 ECI, the Epoch AI capability index
1,508 Arena ELO, human preference · #45
not measured LiveBench, overall average from 0 to 100
No votes yet. Rate it.
What the tests say

Where Muse Spark stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers

Muse Spark has published results on 9 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Jul 12, 2025 and Jul 7, 2026 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.

Where it stands out

Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.

Hle40.6%
#3 of 18 in its generation · #7 of 39 overall
WebDev Arena1,513
#9 of 49 in its generation · #38 of 82 overall
FrontierMath39.0%
#9 of 38 in its generation · #9 of 65 overall
SciCode51.5%
#12 of 46 in its generation · #43 of 104 overall
FrontierMath tier 414.6%
#10 of 38 in its generation, tied with 1 · #10 of 48 overall

Where it falls behind

Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.

ProofBench17.0%
#20 of 35 in its generation · record: 100.0% (Claude Fable 5.1)
See all 9 tests, one by one
TestScoreIn its generationOverallTest record
GPQA Diamond 89.8% #18 / 63 #42 / 173 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 88.9% #27 / 63 #58 / 168 100.0% GPT-5.5
CritPt 11.3% #15 / 50 #47 / 112 32.3% GPT-5.6 Sol
SciCode 51.5% #12 / 46 #43 / 104 66.9% Claude Opus 5.5
WebDev Arena 1,513 #9 / 49 #38 / 82 1,820 Claude Opus 5.5
ProofBench 17.0% #20 / 35 #53 / 74 100.0% Claude Fable 5.1
FrontierMath 39.0% #9 / 38 #9 / 65 51.7% GPT-5.5
FrontierMath tier 4 14.6% #10 / 38 (tied with 1) #10 / 48 39.6% GPT-5.5 Pro
Hle 40.6% #3 / 18 #7 / 39 54.8% GPT-6 Astra

For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.

Comparison

What to compare Muse Spark with

The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.

ModelLabECIELOLiveBenchRelease
Gemini 3 Pro Google DeepMind 152.90 1,523 n/a Nov 18, 2025
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 152.39 1,504 73.0 Feb 17, 2026
Muse Spark Meta AI 152.13 1,508 n/a Apr 8, 2026
Grok 4.20 xAI 152.08 n/a n/a Feb 17, 2026
GLM-5.2 Z.ai (Zhipu AI) 151.86 n/a 73.2 Jun 16, 2026
Gemini 3 Flash Google DeepMind 151.80 1,511 n/a Dec 17, 2025
Qwen 3.8 27B Alibaba 151.55 1,502 75.3 Aug 14, 2026
Head to head

Muse Spark or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the model from another lab closest to Muse Spark in capability. Across the 8 tests both took, this is the score:

Muse Spark ahead on 6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 ahead on 2
Largest differences first
TestMuse SparkClaude Sonnet 4.6
CritPt 11.3% 3.1%
ProofBench 17.0% 45.0%
FrontierMath tier 4 14.6% 8.3%
FrontierMath 39.0% 32.4%
SciCode 51.5% 46.8%
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 88.9% 82.2%
GPQA Diamond 89.8% 83.3%
WebDev Arena 1,513 1,521

Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.

Family

Other models from Meta AI

The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.

ModelReleaseECIELOLiveBenchAccess
Muse Spark Open Oct 15, 2026 no ECI n/a n/a Open weights (restricted use)
Muse Wonder Oct 12, 2026 no ECI 1,540 n/a API access
Muse Spark 1.3 Sep 2, 2026 156.76 1,528 81.6 API access
Muse Spark 1.2 Aug 5, 2026 154.90 1,509 78.0 API access
Muse Spark 1.1 Jul 9, 2026 154.00 1,516 75.3 API access
Muse Spark Apr 8, 2026 152.13 1,508 n/a API access
Llama 4 Maverick Apr 6, 2025 132.20 n/a n/a Open weights (restricted use)
Llama 4 Scout Apr 5, 2025 129.65 n/a n/a Open weights (restricted use)
Llama 3.3 70B Dec 6, 2024 127.34 n/a n/a Open weights (restricted use)
Your rating

Have you used Muse Spark? Rate it

n/a out of 5
no votes yet

Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.

Tap a star to vote.
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about Muse Spark

Where does Muse Spark rank among AI models?

In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, Muse Spark ranks #47 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 152.13. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.

Is Muse Spark better than Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Across the 8 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, Muse Spark comes out ahead on 6, behind on 2 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.

What is Muse Spark best at?

Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of Muse Spark are: Hle (#3 of 18); WebDev Arena (#9 of 49); FrontierMath (#9 of 38). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.

Sources

Where each number comes from

Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.

The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.

LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.

← See the full ranking