Home › AI Benchmark › MiniMax-M3
MiniMax released on Jun 1, 2026 Open weights (restricted use)

MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 (MiniMax) was released on Jun 1, 2026. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #71 out of 267 models, with 147.13. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 1,471 ELO points (#67). On LiveBench, the overall average is 67.3, #53 out of 58 scored models. Against models of the same generation, its best result is on ForecastBench: 61.30, #5 of 25.

#71 of 267 in the ECI ranking
147.13 ECI, the Epoch AI capability index
1,471 Arena ELO, human preference · #67
67.3 LiveBench, overall average from 0 to 100 · #53
No votes yet. Rate it.
What the tests say

Where MiniMax-M3 stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers

MiniMax-M3 has published results on 19 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Sep 4, 2025 and Aug 30, 2026 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.

Where it stands out

Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.

ForecastBench61.30
#5 of 25 in its generation · #11 of 62 overall
GPQA Diamond90.9%
#23 of 72 in its generation, tied with 3 · #30 of 173 overall

Where it falls behind

Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.

Game puzzles8.0%
#45 of 49 in its generation, tied with 1 · record: 84.0% (GPT-6 Astra)
Chess puzzles13.0%
#49 of 53 in its generation · record: 76.0% (GPT-6 Astra)
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS)71.1%
#66 of 72 in its generation, tied with 1 · record: 100.0% (GPT-5.5)
SimpleBench45.8%
#37 of 41 in its generation, tied with 1 · record: 81.9% (Claude Fable 5)
FrontierCode14.7%
#25 of 29 in its generation · record: 54.6% (Claude Opus 5.5)
See all 19 tests, one by one
TestScoreIn its generationOverallTest record
GPQA Diamond 90.9% #23 / 72 (tied with 3) #30 / 173 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 71.1% #66 / 72 (tied with 1) #94 / 168 100.0% GPT-5.5
Dtbench 78.9% #57 / 67 #75 / 148 98.9% Claude Opus 5.5
Lmca 33.70 #52 / 65 #68 / 121 68.23 Claude Opus 5.5
CritPt 3.7% #44 / 65 #63 / 112 32.3% GPT-5.6 Sol
SciCode 47.1% #38 / 61 #56 / 104 66.9% Claude Opus 5.5
ALE-Bench 640 #48 / 56 #68 / 82 2,951 GPT-6 Astra
WebDev Arena 1,487 #30 / 65 #44 / 82 1,820 Claude Opus 5.5
Chess puzzles 13.0% #49 / 53 #69 / 80 76.0% GPT-6 Astra
Game puzzles 8.0% #45 / 49 (tied with 1) #67 / 77 84.0% GPT-6 Astra
ProofBench 18.0% #34 / 52 #51 / 74 100.0% Claude Fable 5.1
SimpleBench 45.8% #37 / 41 (tied with 1) #44 / 74 81.9% Claude Fable 5
ForecastBench 61.30 #5 / 25 #11 / 62 62.50 o3
Vending Bench 2 2,158 #35 / 44 #44 / 57 15,515 GPT-6 Astra
Apex Agents 37.7% #25 / 35 #39 / 50 82.4% Gemini 4 Argon
FrontierCode 14.7% #25 / 29 #39 / 43 54.6% Claude Opus 5.5
Surface Evolver Bench 55.0% #12 / 20 #13 / 24 95.0% Claude Fable 5
Gbaeval 0.9% #15 / 22 #15 / 22 79.6% Claude Opus 5
Osworld 2 4.6% #7 / 9 (tied with 1) #7 / 9 31.4% Claude Opus 5

For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.

Comparison

What to compare MiniMax-M3 with

The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.

ModelLabECIELOLiveBenchRelease
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot 147.98 1,495 n/a Jan 27, 2026
Qwen 3.6 Plus Alibaba 147.49 1,476 68.9 Mar 31, 2026
Qwen3.7-Plus Alibaba 147.30 1,510 n/a Jun 2, 2026
MiniMax-M3 MiniMax 147.13 1,471 67.3 Jun 1, 2026
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI 146.90 1,494 71.8 Oct 6, 2026
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic 146.83 1,488 n/a Sep 29, 2025
Grok Build 0.1 xAI no ECI n/a 67.8 May 29, 2026
Head to head

MiniMax-M3 or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus is the model from another lab closest to MiniMax-M3 in capability. Across the 9 tests both took, this is the score:

MiniMax-M3 ahead on 4 Qwen3.7-Plus ahead on 5
Largest differences first
TestMiniMax-M3Qwen3.7-Plus
CritPt 3.7% 9.1%
Game puzzles 8.0% 17.0%
Osworld 2 4.6% 2.8%
FrontierCode 14.7% 10.2%
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 71.1% 93.3%
Lmca 33.70 37.58
Dtbench 78.9% 84.0%
GPQA Diamond 90.9% 87.9%
SciCode 47.1% 46.1%

Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.

Family

Other models from MiniMax

The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.

ModelReleaseECIELOLiveBenchAccess
MiniMax-M3 Jun 1, 2026 147.13 1,471 67.3 Open weights (restricted use)
MiniMax-M2.7 Mar 18, 2026 145.88 1,454 n/a Open weights (non-commercial)
MiniMax-M2.5 Feb 12, 2026 146.67 1,393 n/a Open weights (unrestricted)
Your rating

Have you used MiniMax-M3? Rate it

n/a out of 5
no votes yet

Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.

Tap a star to vote.
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about MiniMax-M3

Where does MiniMax-M3 rank among AI models?

In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, MiniMax-M3 ranks #71 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 147.13. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.

Is MiniMax-M3 better than Qwen3.7-Plus?

Across the 9 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, MiniMax-M3 comes out ahead on 4, behind on 5 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.

What is MiniMax-M3 best at?

Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of MiniMax-M3 are: ForecastBench (#5 of 25); GPQA Diamond (#23 of 72). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.

Sources

Where each number comes from

Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.

The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.

LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.

← See the full ranking