Home › AI Benchmark › LLaMA-13B
Meta AI released on Feb 24, 2023 Open weights (non-commercial)

LLaMA-13B

LLaMA-13B (Meta AI) was released on Feb 24, 2023. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #243 out of 267 models, with 100.69. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 846 ELO points (#416).

#243 of 267 in the ECI ranking
100.69 ECI, the Epoch AI capability index
846 Arena ELO, human preference · #416
not measured LiveBench, overall average from 0 to 100
No votes yet. Rate it.
What the tests say

Where LLaMA-13B stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers

LLaMA-13B has published results on 12 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between May 30, 2022 and May 25, 2023 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.

Where it stands out

Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.

It is not in the top third of its generation on any test with 6 or more models compared.

Where it falls behind

Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.

GSM8K20.6%
#6 of 9 in its generation · record: 92.0% (GPT-4 (Mar 2023))
TriviaQA77.9%
#7 of 11 in its generation · record: 87.6% (Llama 2-70B)
LAMBADA75.2%
#4 of 7 in its generation · record: 79.8% (Falcon-180B)
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%
#5 of 9 in its generation · record: 89.2% (Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sept 2024))
BoolQ78.7%
#8 of 15 in its generation · record: 90.9% (PaLM 2-L)
See all 12 tests, one by one
TestScoreIn its generationOverallTest record
MMLU 47.7% #5 / 11 #71 / 92 88.1% GPT-4o (May 2024)
ARC (AI2) 52.7% #7 / 15 #40 / 65 95.3% DeepSeek-V3 (Mar 2025)
WinoGrande 73.0% #8 / 16 #31 / 61 89.2% Llama 3.1-405B
GSM8K 20.6% #6 / 9 #47 / 54 92.0% GPT-4 (Mar 2023)
HellaSwag 79.2% #8 / 16 #24 / 51 95.3% GPT-4 (Mar 2023)
PIQA 80.1% #6 / 12 #26 / 43 88.7% GPT-4o mini
BoolQ 78.7% #8 / 15 #25 / 42 90.9% PaLM 2-L
BIG-Bench Hard 37.9% #5 / 9 #31 / 41 89.2% Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sept 2024)
OpenBookQA 56.4% #6 / 14 #20 / 32 88.0% phi-3-mini 3.8B
TriviaQA 77.9% #7 / 11 #17 / 32 87.6% Llama 2-70B
LAMBADA 75.2% #4 / 7 #7 / 20 79.8% Falcon-180B
ScienceQA 43.3% #1 / 2 #4 / 6 88.5% GPT-4o (May 2024)

For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.

Comparison

What to compare LLaMA-13B with

The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.

ModelLabECIELOLiveBenchRelease
Falcon-40B Technology Innovation Institute 104.54 n/a n/a May 25, 2023
Baichuan2-13B Baichuan 103.29 n/a n/a Sep 6, 2023
internlm-7b 102.97 n/a n/a Jul 5, 2023
MPT-30B MosaicML 100.76 n/a n/a Jun 22, 2023
LLaMA-13B Meta AI 100.69 846 n/a Feb 24, 2023
chatglm2-6b 99.05 973 n/a Jun 24, 2023
Baichuan 2-7B Baichuan 96.45 n/a n/a Sep 20, 2023
Head to head

LLaMA-13B or MPT-30B?

MPT-30B is the model from another lab closest to LLaMA-13B in capability. Across the 9 tests both took, this is the score:

LLaMA-13B ahead on 4 MPT-30B ahead on 5
Largest differences first
TestLLaMA-13BMPT-30B
GSM8K 20.6% 34.4%
OpenBookQA 56.4% 52.0%
BoolQ 78.7% 85.0%
TriviaQA 77.9% 73.6%
ARC (AI2) 52.7% 50.6%
WinoGrande 73.0% 71.0%
PIQA 80.1% 81.9%
MMLU 47.7% 47.9%
BIG-Bench Hard 37.9% 38.0%

Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.

Family

Other models from Meta AI

The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.

ModelReleaseECIELOLiveBenchAccess
Llama 3-70B Apr 18, 2024 122.94 n/a n/a Open weights (restricted use)
Llama 2-70B Jul 18, 2023 113.84 n/a n/a Open weights (restricted use)
Llama 2-13B Jul 18, 2023 106.25 n/a n/a Open weights (restricted use)
Llama 2-34B Jul 18, 2023 105.29 n/a n/a Unreleased
Llama 2-7B Jul 18, 2023 99.18 n/a n/a Open weights (restricted use)
LLaMA-65B Feb 24, 2023 110.23 n/a n/a Open weights (non-commercial)
LLaMA-33B Feb 24, 2023 107.49 n/a n/a Open weights (non-commercial)
LLaMA-13B Feb 24, 2023 100.69 846 n/a Open weights (non-commercial)
LLaMA-7B Feb 24, 2023 96.82 n/a n/a Open weights (non-commercial)
Your rating

Have you used LLaMA-13B? Rate it

n/a out of 5
no votes yet

Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.

Tap a star to vote.
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about LLaMA-13B

Where does LLaMA-13B rank among AI models?

In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, LLaMA-13B ranks #243 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 100.69. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.

Is LLaMA-13B better than MPT-30B?

Across the 9 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, LLaMA-13B comes out ahead on 4, behind on 5 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.

Sources

Where each number comes from

Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.

The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.

LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.

← See the full ranking