Home › AI Benchmark › INTELLECT-1
Prime Intellect released on Nov 29, 2024 Unknown

INTELLECT-1

INTELLECT-1 (Prime Intellect) was released on Nov 29, 2024. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #241 out of 267 models, with 100.97.

#241 of 267 in the ECI ranking
100.97 ECI, the Epoch AI capability index
no match Arena ELO, human preference
not measured LiveBench, overall average from 0 to 100
No votes yet. Rate it.
What the tests say

Where INTELLECT-1 stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers

INTELLECT-1 has published results on 6 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Mar 4, 2024 and Feb 27, 2025 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.

Where it stands out

Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.

It is not in the top third of its generation on any test with 6 or more models compared.

Where it falls behind

Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.

BIG-Bench Hard34.9%
#8 of 8 in its generation · record: 89.2% (Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sept 2024))
MMLU49.9%
#37 of 39 in its generation · record: 88.1% (GPT-4o (May 2024))
WinoGrande65.8%
#16 of 18 in its generation · record: 89.2% (Llama 3.1-405B)
GSM8K38.6%
#12 of 14 in its generation · record: 92.0% (GPT-4 (Mar 2023))
HellaSwag71.4%
#11 of 13 in its generation · record: 95.3% (GPT-4 (Mar 2023))
See all 6 tests, one by one
TestScoreIn its generationOverallTest record
MMLU 49.9% #37 / 39 #68 / 92 88.1% GPT-4o (May 2024)
ARC (AI2) 54.5% #12 / 15 #36 / 65 95.3% DeepSeek-V3 (Mar 2025)
WinoGrande 65.8% #16 / 18 #46 / 61 89.2% Llama 3.1-405B
GSM8K 38.6% #12 / 14 #32 / 54 92.0% GPT-4 (Mar 2023)
HellaSwag 71.4% #11 / 13 #37 / 51 95.3% GPT-4 (Mar 2023)
BIG-Bench Hard 34.9% #8 / 8 #36 / 41 89.2% Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sept 2024)

For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.

Comparison

What to compare INTELLECT-1 with

The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.

ModelLabECIELOLiveBenchRelease
Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) Alibaba 113.20 n/a n/a Sep 18, 2024
Falcon 2 11B Technology Innovation Institute 109.63 n/a n/a May 9, 2024
Mistral 7B v0.3 Mistral AI 109.06 n/a n/a May 27, 2024
Qwen2.5-Coder-3B 107.82 n/a n/a Sep 18, 2024
Llama 3.2 1B Meta AI 102.04 n/a n/a Sep 24, 2024
INTELLECT-1 Prime Intellect 100.97 n/a n/a Nov 29, 2024
CodeQwen1.5-7B 94.99 n/a n/a Apr 15, 2024
Head to head

INTELLECT-1 or Qwen2.5-Coder (7B)?

Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) is the model from another lab closest to INTELLECT-1 in capability. Across the 5 tests both took, this is the score:

INTELLECT-1 ahead on 0 Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) ahead on 5
Largest differences first
TestINTELLECT-1Qwen2.5-Coder (7B)
GSM8K 38.6% 86.7%
MMLU 49.9% 68.0%
ARC (AI2) 54.5% 60.9%
WinoGrande 65.8% 72.9%
HellaSwag 71.4% 76.8%

Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.

Your rating

Have you used INTELLECT-1? Rate it

n/a out of 5
no votes yet

Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.

Tap a star to vote.
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about INTELLECT-1

Where does INTELLECT-1 rank among AI models?

In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, INTELLECT-1 ranks #241 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 100.97. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.

Is INTELLECT-1 better than Qwen2.5-Coder (7B)?

Across the 5 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, INTELLECT-1 comes out ahead on 0, behind on 5 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.

Sources

Where each number comes from

Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.

The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.

LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.

← See the full ranking