Home › AI Benchmark › Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic released on Mar 7, 2024 API access

Claude 3 Haiku

Claude 3 Haiku (Anthropic) was released on Mar 7, 2024. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #201 out of 267 models, with 118.39. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 1,206 ELO points (#327). Against models of the same generation, its best result is on MMLU: 73.8%, #12 of 52.

#201 of 267 in the ECI ranking
118.39 ECI, the Epoch AI capability index
1,206 Arena ELO, human preference · #327
not measured LiveBench, overall average from 0 to 100
No votes yet. Rate it.
What the tests say

Where Claude 3 Haiku stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers

Claude 3 Haiku has published results on 11 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Jun 11, 2023 and Jun 5, 2024 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.

Where it stands out

Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.

MMLU73.8%
#12 of 52 in its generation · #32 of 92 overall
GPQA Diamond36.3%
#7 of 19 in its generation · #153 of 173 overall

Where it falls behind

Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.

ForecastBench53.20
#9 of 11 in its generation · record: 62.50 (o3)
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS)1.8%
#11 of 15 in its generation · record: 100.0% (GPT-5.5)
WeirdML9.8%
#5 of 8 in its generation · record: 93.6% (GPT-6 Astra)
Dtbench50.1%
#10 of 18 in its generation · record: 98.9% (Claude Opus 5.5)
MATH level 514.9%
#10 of 18 in its generation · record: 98.1% (GPT-5)
See all 11 tests, one by one
TestScoreIn its generationOverallTest record
GPQA Diamond 36.3% #7 / 19 #153 / 173 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 1.8% #11 / 15 #159 / 168 100.0% GPT-5.5
Dtbench 50.1% #10 / 18 #136 / 148 98.9% Claude Opus 5.5
Lmca 8.84 #5 / 5 #111 / 121 68.23 Claude Opus 5.5
WeirdML 9.8% #5 / 8 #107 / 112 93.6% GPT-6 Astra
MMLU 73.8% #12 / 52 #32 / 92 88.1% GPT-4o (May 2024)
MATH level 5 14.9% #10 / 18 #63 / 73 98.1% GPT-5
ForecastBench 53.20 #9 / 11 #60 / 62 62.50 o3
WinoGrande 74.2% #17 / 34 #29 / 61 89.2% Llama 3.1-405B
CAD-Eval 12.0% #2 / 2 #14 / 14 74.0% o3
ScienceQA 72.0% #2 / 4 #2 / 6 88.5% GPT-4o (May 2024)

For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.

Comparison

What to compare Claude 3 Haiku with

The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.

ModelLabECIELOLiveBenchRelease
Command R+ Cohere 119.37 1,174 n/a Aug 30, 2024
GPT-3.5 Turbo (Nov 2023) OpenAI 118.58 n/a n/a Nov 6, 2023
Qwen2.5-7B Alibaba 118.53 n/a n/a Sep 19, 2024
Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI 118.50 n/a n/a Dec 11, 2023
Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic 118.39 1,206 n/a Mar 7, 2024
Ministral 3B Mistral AI 118.12 n/a n/a Oct 16, 2024
Yi-34B 01.AI 117.43 n/a n/a Nov 2, 2023
Head to head

Claude 3 Haiku or Mixtral 8x7B?

Mixtral 8x7B is the model from another lab closest to Claude 3 Haiku in capability. Across the 6 tests both took, this is the score:

Claude 3 Haiku ahead on 4 Mixtral 8x7B ahead on 2
Largest differences first
TestClaude 3 HaikuMixtral 8x7B
MATH level 5 14.9% 10.0%
GPQA Diamond 36.3% 30.6%
ForecastBench 53.20 56.30
MMLU 73.8% 70.6%
WinoGrande 74.2% 77.2%
Dtbench 50.1% 49.6%

Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.

Family

Other models from Anthropic

The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.

ModelReleaseECIELOLiveBenchAccess
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Feb 24, 2025 141.14 1,360 n/a API access
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) Oct 22, 2024 133.53 1,342 n/a API access
Claude 3.5 Haiku Oct 22, 2024 127.17 1,286 n/a API access
Claude 3 Haiku Mar 7, 2024 118.39 1,206 n/a API access
Claude 3 Opus Feb 29, 2024 126.91 1,264 n/a API access
Claude 3 Sonnet Feb 29, 2024 120.72 1,226 n/a API access
Claude 2.1 Nov 21, 2023 119.30 n/a n/a API access
Claude Instant Aug 9, 2023 120.31 n/a n/a API access
Claude 2 Jul 11, 2023 120.15 n/a n/a API access
Your rating

Have you used Claude 3 Haiku? Rate it

n/a out of 5
no votes yet

Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.

Tap a star to vote.
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about Claude 3 Haiku

Where does Claude 3 Haiku rank among AI models?

In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, Claude 3 Haiku ranks #201 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 118.39. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Across the 6 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, Claude 3 Haiku comes out ahead on 4, behind on 2 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.

What is Claude 3 Haiku best at?

Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of Claude 3 Haiku are: MMLU (#12 of 52); GPQA Diamond (#7 of 19). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.

Sources

Where each number comes from

Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.

The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.

LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.

← See the full ranking